WIP
So I realized today I am not a Democrat. You would think I would have figured that out sometime in the last 39 years, but nope, it took me this long. I was reading something about Senator Obama and his centrist moves now that he has the nomination and I was frothing and muttering and doing Supreme Court math.
And I realized - dude was always a centrist. Hilary Clinton is a centrist. Except for Dennis Kucinich, all those cats are mostly way to the right of what I think proper.
Since I was a kid what I have been is not-Republican. I looked over there in about 1982 and thought, I'll take the opposite of that. But there is only so long you can define yourself negatively and the opposite of Republican is a wide open field. One not occupied by the Democratic National Committee.
I am not a Democrat.
I've been reading a terrific blog recently: Ta-Nehisi Coates. The thing I like about him is that when he has gaps in his knowledge that might be influencing his thinking, his expression, he absolutely cops to it. Which strengthens his writing, because he is thinking about what he's missing, thinking about his own bias, thinking about what there is left to ask.
Jon Carroll is another favorite of mine. His column yesterday was about the fallacy of believing in answers.
I grew up thinking that if you couldn't defend every idea you had to the death, with talking points and bluster, you should keep your mouth shut. Better to be thought dull than ill informed. I hate conflict and debate makes me a bit queasy. So many people think that having their opinion respected means you are not allowed yours, not allowed yours with a big stick and a torch-carrying mob and a lot of righteous outrage. But maybe the point is that you have your ideas and you talk about them with other people - not to win, but to learn. I've been practicing having opinions and not feeling like that makes me a target of the mob. It's going pretty well.
I was going to speculate about what I am, politically - socialist? anarchist? full of despair? progressive? independent? constitutional activist? constitutional purist? left-leaning liberal? crazy hippie pinko? - but I think that defeats the point. Once I slap a label on it, am I still asking myself what I believe? Am I still developing ideas?
Mostly not.
But I think leaving the definition open is very different from defining myself negatively. Is there a political party that believes in not having an answer for everything? That's the one I want. The player to be named later.


